[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Ejercito Mexicano y su papel en Chiapas
Just to clarify some points. I did not translate the article
by Sergio Aguayo on the Mexican army in its entirety for
reasons of space. I only quoted some passages.
Nobody has denied that the army does continue to commit
serious abuses against the civilian population. A passage of
the article by Aguayo, which I omitted, says that:
> "...Una actitud muy peligrosa, y bastante generalizada, es la de
> polarizar la opinion sobre los zapatistas y el ejercito. Los
> partidarios de uno y otro encuentran elementos para descalificarse
> mutuamente imputando a uno de ellos la responsabilidad de cada
> ciclo de tensiones. Seria absurdo negarlos excesos que se han cometido,
> pero es tambien irresponsable minimizar la mesura y el pragmatismo que
> tambien han mostrado el zapatismo y el ejercito.'
[
[ "...A very dangerous and generalized attitude is to polarize
[ opinions on the Zapatistas and the army. Supporters of each side
[ are finding elements to disqualify the other by blaming it of every
[ cycle of tension. It would be absurd to deny the excesses that have
[ been committed, but it is also irresponsible to minimize the moderation,
[ and pragmatism that the Zapatistas and the army have shown."
[
What Aguayo says, and I think he may be right on the point, is
that after Tlaltelolco in 1968, the army has become increasingly
wary of its use as a repressive instrument against society,
and has made it known explicitly to the government, as
the May 5 speech by the Secretary of Defense shows. It is
this idea what is so radical because, if it is true, it means
that the army may some day accept a democratic society.
Although it is true that the army has created a state of
terror in Chiapas, the present state of affairs can not
be compared to the situation that prevailed in the sixties in Mexico.
What we must ask ourselves is: "what has the left accomplished
since then in terms of reducing the repressive powers of the state?"
If the answer is "nothing", then it would be very hard to justify
a continuation of any struggle.
Vladimir Escalante Ramirez.
Follow-Ups: